5 Comments
User's avatar
Chad Brooks's avatar

I am here for all of it!!! I’ve been having the systematics conversation with @Joshua Toepper for the last year.

Expand full comment
Sidney Johnson's avatar

I'd love to hear about which systematic works you have been discussing!

Expand full comment
J.R. Miller's avatar

Oden does great work. Although I think a robust biblical theology is far more important than a systematic theology and far more in the tradition of Wesleyan theology.

Expand full comment
Sidney Johnson's avatar

A robust theological tradition will hopefully engage all four main areas of theology: biblical, systematic, practical, and historical. The Wesleyan tradition has unfortunately neglected the systematic area, to our own detriment. The dogmas of systematic theology also act as guardrails for practical and historical theology. The Scriptures of biblical theology also act as the other guardrail. Together, they keep a tradition from going off the rails, as we have unfortunately seen in so much of the church.

Expand full comment
J.R. Miller's avatar

I do agree that there is an energy between each of these aspects of theology. If you will allow me, here is a post where I explore the limits of systematics. I'd be curious to know if your thinking aligns with my own.

https://open.substack.com/pub/jrmiller777/p/for-better-or-worse-everyone-is-a?r=2phu3d&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false

Expand full comment